Development of intra- and intergroup judgments in the context of moral and social-conventional norms.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Children and adolescents evaluated group inclusion and exclusion in the context of generic and group-specific norms involving morality and social conventions. Participants (N = 381), aged 9.5 and 13.5 years, judged an in-group member's decision to deviate from the norms of the group, whom to include, and whether their personal preference was the same as what they expected a group should do. Deviating from in-group moral norms about unequal allocation of resources was viewed more positively than deviating from conventional norms about nontraditional dress codes. With age, participants gave priority to group-specific norms and differentiated what the group should do from their own preference about the group's decision, revealing a developmental picture about children's complex understanding of group dynamics and group norms.
منابع مشابه
Moral judgments and emotions: adolescents' evaluations in intergroup social exclusion contexts.
This article examines children's moral judgments and emotional evaluations in the context of social exclusion. As they age, children and adolescents face increasingly complex situations in which group membership and allegiance are in opposition with morally relevant decisions, such as the exclusion of an individual from a group. While adolescents are often characterized as being conformists to ...
متن کاملChildren’s Social and Moral Reasoning About Exclusion
Developmental research on social and moral reasoning about exclusion has utilized a social-domain theory, in contrast to a global stage theory, to investigate children’s evaluations of genderand race-based peer exclusion. The social-domain model postulates that moral, social-conventional, and personal reasoning coexist in children’s evaluations of inclusion and exclusion, and that the priority ...
متن کاملMelanie Killen (University of Maryland)
Developmental research on social and moral reasoning about exclusion has utilized a social-domain theory, in contrast to a global stage theory, to investigate children’s evaluations of genderand race-based peer exclusion. The social-domain model postulates that moral, social-conventional, and personal reasoning coexist in children’s evaluations of inclusion and exclusion, and that the priority ...
متن کاملرابطه اخلاق و فناوری در معماری برای جامعه اسلامی
Morality is one of the valuable things which has been considered in Islamic society. All thinkers of morality notional scope have tried to invite people to a good life by preparing them with cases such as contentment, forgiveness, true worshiping, pure life and earning kosher money. Islamic morality is a set of all headings correlated to morality specially morality science which is related to I...
متن کاملPrinciples of Moral Judgment in Social Relations From the Perspective of the Koran and the Hadiths of the Ahl al-Beit
The present article deals with one of the most important and most affected issues in social relations. The arena of social life is a great field of judging the behaviors, traits, and motivations of others. The believers in God ought to do their best to judge justly and truthfully in this arena. Therefore, we need valid principles and criteria for correct moral judgments so that, by observing th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Child development
دوره 84 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013